[c-nsp] BGP confusion in 12.2(18)SXE2

[Bruce Pinsky]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gert Doering wrote:
> 
> 
> Do you think SXF would be a good idea?  Any chance of seeing this bug
> fixed in SXE"3" or SFX"2" any time soon?
> 

I'll have to look tomorrow (my time) for where it looks like it might be
integrated.  Can't say whether it will show up in SXE or SXF or in what
timeframe without a little research.

Getting more customer cases linked to the bug would help get it integrated
in the SX train earlier.

> We're on SXE2 because we want to use BFD - which we're not actually
> doing yet, but certainly want to enable "real soon".
> 

Where do you need BFD?  Are there other solutions that might work or is
this an environment where intermediate infrastructure failures are not
detectable (metro-E for example)?

- --
=========
bep

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFDJ81jE1XcgMgrtyYRAjeTAKCq1e+RpVdcNGWAMQLlZ/6Na+qWaACdG1Om
ZtEgkC5kG6JDvKfqK7ARmIg=
=hytp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----