[c-nsp] Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between multiple BGP links

[sin]

Alok wrote:
> It isnt juniper in my case though but I just remebered the per packet thing
> when I ran into this with another vendor
> 
> however, even link bandwidth via BGP , which i perhaps remember has been
> there since 5.6 doesnt consider the "immediate util" at the time of
> transmitting the packet....
> 
> Perhaps "per packet" with BGP link bandwidth would be good infact  i think..
> .
> or perhaps for flow based, flow setup based on "actual util at the time of
> setup".... though nothing still seems to beat per packet :-) with link
> bandwidth i guess...
> 

i know that with cisco you can setup an acl that can match even/odd ip
addresses and then use that acl in a route map to distribute the traffic
across two links to another bgp speaker (that in it's turn can do the
same with the link back to you). this might be an option for you.