[c-nsp] E/MPLS enabled gear
Kristofer Sigurdsson
kristosig at gmail.com
Wed Apr 5 08:00:32 EDT 2006
Hi,
> As far as I understood the original requirement, it was "something with
> lots of GigE ports" - which sounds like "potentially very much bandwidth"
> to me...
True, but never hurts to keep the options open. I guess what I was
trying to get across was that the port density and the EoMPLS
capabilities didn't need to be in the same box...
-Kristo
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list