[c-nsp] E/MPLS enabled gear

Kristofer Sigurdsson kristosig at gmail.com
Wed Apr 5 08:00:32 EDT 2006


Hi,

> As far as I understood the original requirement, it was "something with
> lots of GigE ports" - which sounds like "potentially very much bandwidth"
> to me...

True, but never hurts to keep the options open.  I guess what I was
trying to get across was that the port density and the EoMPLS
capabilities didn't need to be in the same box...

-Kristo



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list