[c-nsp] PPPoE Session Limit?

Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboehmer at cisco.com
Mon Apr 10 12:21:25 EDT 2006


Oh, you are rejecting IPCP:

*Mar  1 23:18:00.174: Vi2.6 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 3 len 40 protocol
IPCP
*Mar  1 23:18:00.174: Vi2.6 LCP:  (0x80210101002203060000000081060000)
*Mar  1 23:18:00.174: Vi2.6 LCP:  (0x00008306000000008206000000008406)
*Mar  1 23:18:00.174: Vi2.6 LCP:  (0x00000000)

this is weird. can we see the full config of the box? Did you run out of
pool addresses?

	oli

Graham Wooden <> wrote on Monday, April 10, 2006 5:56 PM:

> I don't see any errors that I can tell that state that its hitting any
> limit.  Below is the latest "show ppp nego", "show vtemplate", and
> "debug ppp error", which has information that I can't really decrypt
> well. 
> 
> There where no session-limits, but I went ahead and added some
> high-number ones, which didn't seem to help.
> 
> 
> *Mar  1 23:21:46.134: Vi2.6 PPP: Missed link down notification
> *Mar  1 23:21:49.982: ppp198 PPP LCP not accepting sent CONFACK
> *Mar  1 23:21:51.158: Vi2.6 PPP: Missed link down notification
> *Mar  1 23:21:54.978: ppp199 PPP LCP not accepting sent CONFACK
> *Mar  1 23:21:56.150: Vi2.6 PPP: Missed link down notification
> *Mar  1 23:21:59.986: ppp200 PPP LCP not accepting sent CONFACK
> *Mar  1 23:22:01.142: Vi2.6 PPP: Missed link down notification
> *Mar  1 23:22:04.986: ppp201 PPP LCP not accepting sent CONFACK
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Virtual access subinterface creation is globally enabled
> 
>          Active     Active    Subint  Pre-clone Pre-clone
>        Interface Subinterface Capable Available   Limit
>        --------- ------------ ------- --------- ---------
> Vt10           0            5   Yes          --        --
> 
> Usage Summary
>                       Interface   Subinterface
>                       ---------   ------------
> Current in use                2              5
> Current free                  0              5
> Total                         2             10
> 
> Cumulative created            3           2208
> Cumulative freed              0           2203
> 
> Base virtual access interfaces: 2
> Total create or clone requests: 2207
> Cancelled create or clone requests: 0
> Current request queue size: 0
> Current free pending: 0
> Current recycle pending: 0
> 
> Maximum request duration: 856 msec
> Average request duration: 19 msec
> Last request duration: 16 msec
> 
> Maximum processing duration: 856 msec
> Average processing duration: 19 msec
> Last processing duration: 16 msec
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.070: ppp152 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, by this end
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.070: ppp152 PAP: I AUTH-REQ id 2 len 34 from
> "user at domain.local"
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.070: ppp152 PAP: Authenticating peer
> user at domain.local 
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.070: ppp152 PPP: Phase is FORWARDING, Attempting
> Forward 
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.074: ppp152 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING,
> Unauthenticated User
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.074: ppp152 PPP: Phase is FORWARDING, Attempting
> Forward 
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.078: ppp152 PPP: Send Message[Connect Local]
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.098: ppp152 PPP: Bind to [Virtual-Access2.6]
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.098: Vi2.6 PPP: Send Message[Static Bind Response]
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.106: Vi2.6 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING,
> Authenticated User 
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.110: Vi2.6 PAP: O AUTH-ACK id 2 len 5
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.110: Vi2.6 PPP: Phase is UP
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.114: Vi2.6 PPP: Process pending ncp packets
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.170: Vi2.6 IPCP: I CONFREQ [Not negotiated] id 1 len
> 34 
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.170: Vi2.6 IPCP:    Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000)
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.170: Vi2.6 IPCP:    PrimaryDNS 0.0.0.0
> (0x810600000000) 
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.170: Vi2.6 IPCP:    SecondaryDNS 0.0.0.0
> (0x830600000000) 
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.170: Vi2.6 IPCP:    PrimaryWINS 0.0.0.0
> (0x820600000000) 
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.170: Vi2.6 IPCP:    SecondaryWINS 0.0.0.0
> (0x840600000000) 
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.174: Vi2.6 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 3 len 40
> protocol IPCP 
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.174: Vi2.6 LCP:  (0x80210101002203060000000081060000)
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.174: Vi2.6 LCP:  (0x00008306000000008206000000008406)
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.174: Vi2.6 LCP:  (0x00000000)
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.226: Vi2.6 LCP: I TERMREQ [Open] id 3 len 4
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.230: Vi2.6 LCP: O TERMACK [Open] id 3 len 4
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.230: Vi2.6 PPP: Sending Acct Event[Down] id[3378]
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.230: Vi2.6 PPP: Phase is TERMINATING
> *Mar  1 23:18:00.294: Vi2.6 PPP: Block vaccess from being freed [0x18]
> *Mar  1 23:18:01.110: Vi2.6 PPP: Missed link down notification
> *Mar  1 23:18:01.110: Vi2.6 LCP: State is Closed
> *Mar  1 23:18:01.110: Vi2.6 PPP: Phase is DOWN
> 
> 
> On 4/10/06 11:45 AM, "Kristofer Sigurdsson" <kristosig at gmail.com>
> wrote: 
> 
>> 2006/4/10, Marko Milivojevic <markom at pangalactic.net>:
>>> 
>>> You didn't provide any equipment details, so answering 100%
>>> correctly is a bit difficult. However, you could be hitting several
>>> limits. Two of the most likely are number of usable VC's on ATM
>>> interface (if you're using one) and the other is platform IDB limit.
>> 
>> If it's an IDB limit, you should see errors about that.  On many
>> platforms, you have a default session limit, which you can change
>> manually.  However, that should also be in the logs if that's the
>> problem. 
>> 
>> -Kristo
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list