[c-nsp] dot1q-tunneling
Boštjan Fele
Bostjan.Fele at avtenta.si
Thu Aug 3 02:53:40 EDT 2006
Been a while since I worked with Extreme switches..
If Cisco is doing Q-in-Q then Extreme is droping frames. Extreme does not expect Q-IN-Q with 0x8100 ethertype. It is a sort of security feature to prevent VLAN hopping, but check with Extreme gurus...
Regards,
Bostjan
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Alex Cruz Farmer
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 6:37 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] dot1q-tunneling
Hi,
I've currently got two 3750s in two locations with an interlink inbetween using Extreme switches.
Currently, the configuration seems to be fine:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/24
switchport access vlan 544
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
duplex full
speed 100
no cdp enable
end
then...
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/18
switchport access vlan 544
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
duplex full
speed 100
no cdp enable
end
The Extreme config is super simple, the ports are untagged on Vlan 544 on the 3750 ends, then tagged on the uplink ports between the two extreme switches at each site. Jumbo frames *is* enabled on the Extreme switches (9216).
Both Ciscos have the following MTU settings:
System MTU size is 1546 bytes
System Jumbo MTU size is 1546 bytes
I can't see what could be wrong, as from what I've read simply trunking the Vlan should work, although, there is a change of Vendor inbetween... If anyone has any suggestions that would be much appreciated. These switches aren't currently live, so settings can be changed. :)
Kind regards,
Alex.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list