[c-nsp] MPLS/VPN + Internet Setup

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday 03 August 2006 19:36, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) 
wrote:

> yes, vrf-lite is used for this purpose in several networks I'm
> aware of, so I'd call this still best current practice for
> most applications (maybe not for some very security sensible
> folks who don't trust VRF-lite segmentation on the CE).
>
> You might need to spend some thoughts on the QoS part (if
> needed), often the requirement is to be able to use the full
> access speed for either VRF/sub-interface, but still deploy
> some granular min-bw guarantees for certain classes within the
> vrf.. this usually asks for a hierarchical qos concept on the
> physical interface level.

Many thanks, Oli.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20060804/1b4a65e1/attachment.bin