[c-nsp] Sup720 image

[Robert D. Holtz]

Phil Mayers wrote:

> While we're on the subject, if anyone from Cisco is paying attention 
> - your stupid shenanigans with slightly non-FAT filesystems and 
> hidden areas are EXTREMELY IRRITATING and actively detrimental to 
> the ability to recover a broken box.

<snip>

> That's sound advice, right up until the point cisco make the base image 
> 64Mb (which may of course never happen). Sadly it does not help the OP.

Cisco already has images > 64mb so they really do need to address the issue
that you speak of.  This also has another interesting side effect: You can't
use TFTP to transfer images > 64Mb ... it bombs out.  You have to use FTP.