[c-nsp] dropping traffic for RFC3330 networks
lee.e.rian at census.gov
lee.e.rian at census.gov
Tue Aug 29 00:07:58 EDT 2006
Jay Ford <jay-ford at uiowa.edu> wrote on 08/28/2006 06:28:20 PM:
> That list looks a bit broken to me.
It was - thanks for pointing it out. This one has the correct masks for
128.0.0.0/16 and 172.16.0.0/12
ip route 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 null0
ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 null0
ip route 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 null0
ip route 128.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 null0
ip route 169.254.0.0 255.255.0.0 null0
ip route 172.16.0.0 255.240.0.0 null0
ip route 191.255.0.0 255.255.0.0 null0
ip route 192.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 null0
ip route 192.0.2.0 255.255.255.0 null0
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 null0
ip route 198.18.0.0 255.254.0.0 null0
ip route 223.255.255.0 255.255.255.0 null0
ip route 240.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 null0
Now I'm wondering about the 192.0.0.0/24 and 192.0.2.0/24 address blocks.
ARIN has them as
CIDR: 192.0.0.0/17
NetName: RESERVED-192
Anyone have a link to documentation for that block? All I've been able to
find documentation for is 192.0.0.0/24 and 192.0.2.0/24
Thanks,
Lee
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list