[c-nsp] SVI or not SVI

[Victor Cappuccio]

If my vote counts, I would use no switchport and assign a L3 IP address
to the 2/48 that borders to the Juniper Box, using an SVI some QOS
Funtions like Policing traffic could be a night mare to configure..
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12225see/scg
/swqos.htm#wp1284809



-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brendan Mannella
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 11:03 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] SVI or not SVI

Hello,

 

I am in the process of configuring my new Cisco Cat 6504 with Sup32.
Interface 2/48 is going to be connected to my interface on my Juniper
border
router. Something like this...

 

Juniper M10 ---> Cat 6504 

 

My question is, what is the proper way to do this connection? Should int
2/48 be a switchport and then create a SVI with the ip address. Or
should it
NOT be a switchport and I configure the ip directly on the interface.
But if
I place the ip directly on the interface, then I am unable to use the
"switchport mode access" and "switchport access vlan XX" on the
interface.

 

Thanks,

 

Brendan


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.4/563 - Release Date:
12/2/2006
9:59 AM
 
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/