[c-nsp] 7600: eompls on Vlan ?

Tue Feb 14 11:28:24 EST 2006

David,

The Sup2 can't do MPLS on the Sup - it has to use the line cards, ie.
OSM/FlexWAN etc.

The Sup720 (vanila) is the same.  The Sup720-3B and -3BXL can do MPLS,
but they have this restriction.

-Kristo

2006/2/14, David Freedman <david.freedman at uk.clara.net>:
> I'm right in thinking that this restriction only applies to Sup2
> architecture and not Sup720, surely the 720 should be able to do SVI
> EOMPLS without the need for the PE->P link to be on a WAN module?
>
> Dave.
>
> Bill Wade (wwade) wrote:
> > SVI based EoMPLS --
> >
> >   interface Vlan501
> >    xconnect 192.1.1.1 501 encapsulation mpls
> >
> > requires an OSM+, FlexWAN, enhanced FlexWAN or SIP-600 as MPLS core
> > facing interface.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> >> Alexandre Snarskii
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:43 AM
> >> To: Cisco-NSP Mailing List
> >> Subject: [c-nsp] 7600: eompls on Vlan ?
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> As my tests show me, EoMPLS VC configured on interface Vlan
> >> does not come up (and debug shows "Imposition setup
> >> incomplete because unable to find a tunnel label" error), but
> >> the same xconnect config applied to subinterface works well,
> >> vc comes up and passes traffic.
> >>
> >> IOS version: 12.2(18)SXD7, also tested with 12.2(18)SXF2, ip
> >> services.
> >> Testbed network topology: c2950 <-> Gi4/4 Sup720 Gi4/12 <->
> >> GE3/1 Sup2/OSM
> >>
> >> Is this a bug or some kind of feature ? If a bug: is there an
> >> IOS version unaffected by this bug, or when it planned to be
> >> fixed ? If a feature - are there any hints to get eompls
> >> working together with switching without hardware upgrade ?
> >> (box should stay as simple as chassis+sup+ WS-X6516-GBIC combo).
> >>
> >> Full log of "failed" connection:
> >>
> >> Feb 13 13:45:54.451 MSK: AToM SMGR [RE.MO.TE.IP, 900]:
> >> Adjacency creation succeeded for Vlan900.
> >> Feb 13 13:45:54.515 MSK: DISP XDR cktidx: 196 Feb 13
> >> 13:45:54.515 MSK: AToM SMGR [RE.MO.TE.IP, 900]: Processing
> >> imposition update, vc_handle 50D68200, update_action 1,
> >> remote_vc_label 731 Feb 13 13:45:54.515 MSK: CWAN_ATOM:
> >> AtomSmgr Set parentRew, vcID: 900 Feb 13 13:45:54.515 MSK:
> >> CWAN_ATOM: GetParentRew failed, vcId: 900, rewCnt: 0 Feb 13
> >> 13:45:54.515 MSK: CWAN_ATOM: lb-mode: default, vcId: 900,
> >> rew: n/a Feb 13 13:45:54.515 MSK: CWAN_ATOM: find parentRew
> >> for vcId: 900 failed Feb 13 13:45:54.515 MSK: AToM SMGR
> >> [RE.MO.TE.IP, 900]: no parent rewrite: LFIB entry not present
> >> or unresolved Feb 13 13:45:54.515 MSK: AToM SMGR
> >> [RE.MO.TE.IP, 900]: Imposition setup incomplete because
> >> unable to find a tunnel label Feb 13 13:45:54.515 MSK: AToM
> >> SMGR: Processing TFIB event for RE.MO.TE.IP Feb 13
> >> 13:45:54.515 MSK: CWAN_ATOM: AtomSmgr Set parentRew, vcID:
> >> 900 Feb 13 13:45:54.515 MSK: CWAN_ATOM: GetParentRew failed,
> >> vcId: 900, rewCnt: 0 Feb 13 13:45:54.515 MSK: CWAN_ATOM:
> >> lb-mode: default, vcId: 900, rew: n/a Feb 13 13:45:54.515
> >> MSK: CWAN_ATOM: find parentRew for vcId: 900 failed Feb 13
> >> 13:45:54.515 MSK: AToM SMGR [RE.MO.TE.IP, 900]: no parent
> >> rewrite: LFIB entry not present or unresolved Feb 13
> >> 13:45:54.515 MSK: AToM SMGR [RE.MO.TE.IP, 900]: Imposition
> >> setup incomplete because unable to find a tunnel label
> >>
> >> The same log, using subinterface with the same vlan configured:
> >>
> >> Feb 13 14:25:48.745 MSK: AToM SMGR [RE.MO.TE.IP, 900]:
> >> Processing disposition update, vc_handle 50D68200,
> >> update_action 1, local_vc_label 489 Feb 13 14:25:48.745 MSK:
> >> AToM SMGR [RE.MO.TE.IP, 900]: Adjacency creation succeeded
> >> for GigabitEthernet4/4.900.
> >> Feb 13 14:25:48.805 MSK: AToM SMGR [RE.MO.TE.IP, 900]:
> >> Processing imposition update, vc_handle 50D68200,
> >> update_action 1, remote_vc_label 731 Feb 13 14:25:48.805 MSK:
> >> CWAN_ATOM_IMP: XDR HW l2ckt: 900, ACtype: 4, local_vc_label:
> >> 489 Feb 13 14:25:48.805 MSK: AToM SMGR [RE.MO.TE.IP, 900]:
> >> Imposition Programmed, Output Interface: Gi4/12, flags 0x0011
> >> Feb 13 14:25:48.805 MSK: AToM SMGR: Processing TFIB event for
> >> RE.MO.TE.IP Feb 13 14:25:48.805 MSK: CWAN_ATOM_IMP: XDR HW
> >> l2ckt: 900, ACtype: 4, local_vc_label: 489 Feb 13
> >> 14:25:48.805 MSK: AToM SMGR [RE.MO.TE.IP, 900]: Imposition
> >> Programmed, Output Interface: Gi4/12, flags 0x0011
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>