[c-nsp] pix upgrade to 7.x from 6.34

[nevot]

Remote users or remote lans?
I am talking about lan2lan vpns


2006/2/17, Adam Maloney <adam at whee.org>:
>
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, nevot wrote:
>
> > In the other way, I just recently (half an hour ago) downgraded a pair
> of
> > PIX515E because our VPNs were sistematically dropped every hour, making
> the
> > vpns unusable. Though I will wait our provider's response, I think
> version 7
> > is not still ready for use, at least not in a IPSEC VPN scenario.
>
> I ran 7.0(2) for the last few months, then upgraded to 7.0(4) because of a
> AAA session-limit bug.  But other than that, no problems with remote users
> staying connected:
>
> Duration     : 2d 0h:59m:30s
> Duration     : 3d 1h:23m:09s
> Duration     : 1d 0h:28m:07s
> Duration     : 7d 23h:52m:18s
> Duration     : 3d 18h:52m:35s
> Duration     : 1d 0h:01m:23s
> Duration     : 1d 23h:08m:59s
> Duration     : 10d 18h:59m:38s
> Duration     : 8d 21h:25m:26s
> Duration     : 1d 20h:52m:17s
>
> (Some of the day+ connections)
>
> I've been on 7.0(4) for:
> up 12 days 17 hours
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>