[c-nsp] UDLD - why is default 60 seconds?

Saku Ytti saku+cisco-nsp at ytti.fi
Fri Feb 24 02:21:59 EST 2006


On (2006-02-24 09:15 +0200), Hank Nussbacher wrote:
 
> BFD only works on 12.2(18)SXE, 12.0(31)S, 12.4(4)T, and 12.0(32)S.  The
> remote systems are all 12.4(3b) and the core is 12.2(18)SXE.  So BFD is
> not a solution and UDLD doesn't appear to be supported either in 12.4 so
> what other solution would people recommend to determine failed P-2-P GE
> links?

 If you can't use BFD, you really don't have alternatives, you just need
to rely on the IGP's regular livelyness detection.
 Of course if it's P-2-P in most failure scenarios you'll see interface
going down, and you can react without latency. Assuming 'carrier-delay msec
0' is configured (please complement it with IP event dampening).

> Thanks,
> Hank
> 
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Hank
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> >
> > --
> >   ++ytti
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
> >  at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
> >
> 

-- 
  ++ytti


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list