[c-nsp] draft-ietf-l3vpn-rfc2547bis-03.txt

[Marko Milivojevic]

	No, it means that if the interface does not have VRF association it doesn't 
drop the packet, but rather forwards it using default routing table.  Ie. 
behaves like pre-VPN PE.

Marko.

Kim Onnel wrote:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l3vpn-rfc2547bis-03.txt
> 
> I was reading the RFC and i stopped at the below part:
> 
> If i understand correctly, this means that if a packet from CE doesnt find a
> route in its VRF, its not dropped ?
> 
> 3.1. VRFs and Attachment Circuits
> 
> If an IP packet arrives over an attachment circuit which is not
>    associated with any VRF, the packet's destination address is looked up
>    in the default forwarding table, and the packet is routed
>    accordingly.  Packets forwarded according to the default forwarding
>    table include packets from neighboring P or PE routers, as well as
>    packets from customer-facing attachment circuits that have not been
>    associated with VRFs.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>