[c-nsp] Strange VIP CPU load
Bill Wichers
billw at waveform.net
Fri Jan 13 00:45:50 EST 2006
dCEF is running everywhere -- when that stops I can usually tell pretty
easily from the big spike in RSP CPU load.
Nothing in the process table was showing significantly more CPU than
normal, which I found very surprising.
This particular box is running 12.2(29). I will have to dig around and see
if there are any bugs that look related.
I only have to put up with this old box another maybe 6 months or so, then
it gets replaced :-)
-Bill
> I'm assuming Distributed CEF is running. Is your IP Input running at a
> high percentage rate? If so I would verify that CEF is working properly
> on this VIP card. If everything looks good there what IOS are you
> running? There might be a possible bug and worth checking into. Let me
> know what you find out. ttyl
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bill Wichers
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:21 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Strange VIP CPU load
>
> I have customer running some kind of streaming app that seems to be
> using
> excessive CPU load and I'm curious if anyone knows what might cause
> this.
> Normally I only see this kind of VIP load from DoS, not from only about
> 18
> Mb/s more "legit" traffic (total on the interface was about 38-45 Mb/s
> during the "problem" period of 100% CPU load.
>
> I would expect an increase in CPU load, but not going from about 30-40%
> to
> 100% with only 18Mb/s increase in traffic, one direction (about a 30-40%
> increase in total traffic through the interface). Does anyone know what
> might cause this much CPU load for normal (i.e., not all minimum-size,
> random DoS style packets)? Below is a copy of the per-minute graph from
> 'show tech' for the VIP. Ingress side VIP only is affected, egress VIP
> is
> not showing anything abnormal, which is unlike DoS. The per-second graph
> was pretty much solidly 100% during the peaks that show on the
> per-minute
> graph.
>
> Any ideas or even wild guesses much appreciated!
>
> -Bill
>
>
> |- This is where I shaped the customer at the switch
> | 1
> 3434449979696699899969497699999999956999966998999906795799
> 8496249969297099699936838909989999932799999998999906460599
> 100 ** * * ** #** * ******#* **** ** ***#* * **
> 90 ** * # #**#** * * *******#* **** ******#* * **
> 80 *#** # #**#*# * ** *##*##*#* ###* ***#**## * *#*
> 70 *#** #* ##*### * ***###*####* ###***##*#*###*** *##
> 60 *#*#*#**##*###** #**######### *####**########*** *##
> 50 * ##*#############*############*######################
> 40 *#*#######################################################
> 30 ##########################################################
> 20 ##########################################################
> 10 ##########################################################
> 0....5....1....1....2....2....3....3....4....4....5....5....
> 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5
>
> CPU% per minute (last 60 minutes)
> * = maximum CPU% # = average CPU%
>
>
>
> *****************************
> Waveform Technology
> Systems Engineer
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
*****************************
Waveform Technology
Systems Engineer
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list