[c-nsp] mpls performance on 7500/7200

[Nick Shah]

Matthew

In my opinion, its different beast - different talk. What do you want to
do with 72/7500 ? I am running some quite feature rich PE features on
7200 , prolly not the best thing you may want out of a P though. 

I personally have found the 7200/7301 to be the swiss army knife, which
happens to run virtually most features at reasonable price/performance
matrix.

7500 a little bit similar, but to watch out for considering most of the
line being EOL/EOS. 

Again, beg the question, what do you want to run them as P or PE ?

Rgds
nick

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of matthew zeier
Sent: Friday, 20 January 2006 4:04 p.m.
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] mpls performance on 7500/7200


So if MPLS on an MSFC2 is largely unsupported due to performance, what
sort of 
performance can I expect on a 7500 or 7200 running MPLS? Or is that
something 
to stay away from?
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it.