[c-nsp] SVI's on 3550s
Ian MacKinnon
ian.mackinnon at gmail.com
Mon Jan 30 10:29:09 EST 2006
Thanks Aivars, thats what I thought.
The reason for not having it on the physical interface is that it is
already in the field :(
Will get it brought back to the office and reconfigured.
On 1/30/06, Aivars <aivars at ml.lv> wrote:
> A short answer is - NO.
>
> If you have the only interface in the vlan, why wouldn't you do no
> switchport on the physical interface and put IP directly on it?
>
> Aivars
>
> Monday, January 30, 2006, 5:03:11 PM, you wrote:
>
> IM> Hi All,
>
> IM> Quick question, do SVI's track physical interface states?
>
> IM> I am trying to configure a floating static but the original route
> IM> never disappears as the SVi stays up, even though the only interface
> IM> in the vlan goes down.
>
> IM> interface FastEthernet0/1
> IM> description ConnectiontoLeasedLine
> IM> switchport access vlan 10
> IM> switchport mode access
> IM> no cdp enable
> IM> !
> IM> interface Vlan10
> IM> description ConnectiontoLeasedLine
> IM> ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.80 255.255.255.252
> IM> !
>
> IM> interface Vlan12
> IM> description ISDNbackup
> IM> ip address xxx.xxx.xxx98 255.255.255.252
> IM> !
> IM> ip classless
> IM> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.69
> IM> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.97 100
>
> IM> _______________________________________________
> IM> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> IM> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> IM> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list