[c-nsp] Esoteric NAT question...

Brett Looney brett at looney.id.au
Wed Jul 26 06:15:35 EDT 2006


At 17:52 26/07/2006, you wrote:
>well, we check the route-map/ACL once when there is no NAT translation
>(before 12.3T in the process path, in the interrupt context in later
>releases), so the difference in execution speed between route-map and
>ACL (if there is any) is rather negligble, unless you are creating
>*many* translations, but then you might saturate the CPU either way.
>
>I'm not aware of any performance study comparing these two options, but
>I'd be surprised if there was any..

Ok. Thanks for the info!

B. 



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list