[c-nsp] Cisco BFD and NSF

[Enno Rey]

Mikael,

can you tell me (us) a bit about the deployment details and the conditions when those flaps occurred? What was the 'associated risk' or what impact did they hacve? Feel free to reply off-list when that deems appropriate...

thanks,

Enno


On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:23:31AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, David J. Hughes wrote:
> 
> > BFD is such a great step forwards for high availability.  It's a shame 
> > that it appears to be a bit piecemeal at the moment.
> 
> We've seen BFD-flaps due to high CPU load on one end, so one should really 
> consider the risk/benefit ration when deploying it.
> 
> -- 
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-- 
Enno Rey

ERNW Enno Rey Netzwerke GmbH - Breslauer Str. 28 - 69124 Heidelberg
Tel. +49 6221 480390 - Fax 6221 419008 - Cell +49 173 6745902
www.ernw.de - PGP 055F B3F3 FE9D 71DD C0D5  444E C611 033E 3296 1CC1