[c-nsp] Cisco BFD and NSF

[David J. Hughes]

On 30/07/2006, at 6:23 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

>> BFD is such a great step forwards for high availability.  It's a  
>> shame
>> that it appears to be a bit piecemeal at the moment.
>
> We've seen BFD-flaps due to high CPU load on one end, so one should  
> really
> consider the risk/benefit ration when deploying it.

Wow, that's a major disappointment.  So much for BFD being  
implemented in the forwarding plane.


David
...