[c-nsp] FWSM vs. stand alone FW

Voll, Scott Scott.Voll at wesd.org
Tue Mar 14 18:21:00 EST 2006


On the Cat you need the following commands

firewall multiple-vlan-interfaces
firewall module 2 vlan-group 2,500  <-- this attaches the Vlan groups to
the FWSM in slot 2
firewall vlan-group 2  2,254 <-- these are your groups and which Vlan's
are in each group.
firewall vlan-group 500  500,501


on the FWSM:

you will need to setup names like you do on the Pix

nameif vlan2 <nameofinterface> security100

setup 
  passwords
  fixups
  access-lists
  nat / pat
  ip addresses
  statics
  routes

If you can setup a Pix it's not much different.

Scott

PS.  If you're trying to do WAN interfaces it gets complicated quick.
<lots of routemaps and static routes>  Troubleshooting is a pain.



-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Henry Anslinger
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 2:50 PM
To: matthew zeier; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FWSM vs. stand alone FW

Does anyone have any good how tos for the FWSM they will share?

thanks
Ivan

matthew zeier <mrz at velvet.org> wrote: 
Anyone have constructive comparisons between a FWSM in a 6509 vs using 
an external firewall - PIX or Netscreen ?  I'll mostly be hit with 
simultaneous connection limits before I hit bandwidth issues but 
certainly something that can do well in excess of 200Mbps.

thanks.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


		
---------------------------------
On Yahoo!7
  Dancing With the Stars: Win tickets to the Grand Final! 
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list