[c-nsp] Cisco 3750G vs. HP Procurve

[Lunceford, Dan]

This is true with the 2500 series, but not the 2600 and 2800.  The 2500
series use a single mac forwarding table (as I found out when I put a
BD10k in), but the 2600's have no issue with this (as they have a table
per VLAN), nor do the 2800 series.

This has been tested and verified in my environment.

Just a FYI.

-drl

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of ilia p
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 3:05 PM
To: Tim Durack
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3750G vs. HP Procurve


On 3/25/06, Tim Durack <tdurack at gmail.com> wrote:
> That's only true of older ProCurve's with single bridge tables, such 
> as the 4000m. Anything newer such as the 5300 doesn't have this 
> restriction.
2524 is the one I had in mind, no comment on the 5300s

--
ilia

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4504 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20060325/7dbd46b2/attachment-0001.bin