[c-nsp] catalyst6509 not suitable for L3 traffic forwarding?

[Joe Shen]

Hi,


we have several Catalyst6509 which have SupII and
Sup720 installed. Currently, some of those
catalyst6509 has about 100G - 200G traffic switched.
Most of those traffic is L3 switch. And, there is also
VLAN transmitted as  DSLAM--6509--BRAS.
we are considering optimizing the system archtecture.
someone said Catalyst6509 is not fitful to L3 traffic,
so it should be replaced by Service Router with high
port density. 

Is that true?

Joe




	

	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
雅虎1G免费邮箱百分百防垃圾信 
http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/