[c-nsp] Extreme vs. Cisco

[Church, Chuck]

Not to change the subject, but how is a 299.x.x.x represented in an IP
header?  Just curious...
 
 
Chuck 


On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 09:24:34AM -0500, Drew Weaver wrote:
> 
> 	Another good example of this is during SQL Slammer's
> introduction we were using Black Diamond 6808s; and I remember all of
> our Black Diamonds raising to 100% CPU/RAM utilization simultaneously
> due to un-patched/unmanaged boxes being connected to them and sending
> thousands of connections to 'unroutable IP addresses' 299.x.x.x, etc.
> and the black diamond was happily trying to pass them along
> unsuccessfully forever. I've not seen this behavior with the Catalyst.