[c-nsp] dueling OSPF routes

[Fedorov, Konstantin]

Hi,

Try change metric type to 2 on both of this routes.

Or just on route from OSPF process 2.

This is accomplished on routers which redistribute this external routes.

-----------------------
Sincerely Yours,
Konstantin Fedorov

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Oliver Boehmer
(oboehmer)
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:44 AM
To: Ed Ravin
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] dueling OSPF routes

cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net <> wrote on Tuesday, November 14, 2006
6:48 AM:

> I have a 7500-series router running IOS 12.something.S with two
> OSPF processes, 1 and 2.  I am receiving the same route from both
> processes.  I want to always prefer the route from OSPF 2 if it
> exists. 

router ospf 2
 distance 109

(or "distance 101" in ospf 1). OSPF's default distance is 110. 

When the RIP needs to discriminate between different processes (static,
connected is a process in this context as well) presenting the same
route, it uses the admin distance as the protocols' metric is not
necessarily comparable..
see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/admin_distance.html

	oli

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/