[c-nsp] power requirement for sup720 migration
Michael Balasko
Michael.Balasko at cityofhenderson.com
Wed Nov 15 19:14:18 EST 2006
Gert,
I here is a dump of a few of our 6513's Same power allocation for the
same type of blade.
1 WS-X6K-S2U-MSFC2 145.32 3.46 145.32 3.46 ok
2 WS-X6516-GBIC 142.80 3.40 145.32 3.46 ok
3 WS-X6516-GBIC 142.80 3.40 142.80 3.40 ok
4 WS-X6548-GE-TX 142.80 3.40 142.80 3.40 ok
5 WS-X6548-GE-TX 142.80 3.40 142.80 3.40 ok
6 WS-X6148-GE-TX 103.74 2.47 103.74 2.47 ok
8 WS-X6148-GE-TX 103.74 2.47 103.74 2.47 ok
9 WS-X6148-GE-TX 103.74 2.47 103.74 2.47 ok
10 WS-X6148-GE-TX 103.74 2.47 103.74 2.47 ok
11 WS-X6148-GE-TX 103.74 2.47 103.74 2.47 ok
12 WS-X6516-GBIC 142.80 3.40 142.80 3.40 ok
13 WS-X6416-GBIC 118.02 2.81 118.02 2.81 ok
1 WS-X6K-S2U-MSFC2 145.32 3.46 145.32 3.46 ok
2 WS-X6516-GBIC 142.80 3.40 145.32 3.46 ok
3 WS-X6408-GBIC 63.00 1.50 63.00 1.50 ok
5 WS-X6548-GE-TX 142.80 3.40 142.80 3.40 ok
6 WS-X6548-GE-TX 142.80 3.40 142.80 3.40 ok
8 WS-X6548-GE-TX 142.80 3.40 142.80 3.40 ok
9 WS-X6148-GE-TX 103.74 2.47 103.74 2.47 ok
10 WS-X6148-GE-TX 103.74 2.47 103.74 2.47 ok
11 WS-X6148-GE-TX 103.74 2.47 103.74 2.47 ok
12 WS-X6416-GBIC 118.02 2.81 118.02 2.81 ok
13 WS-X6416-GBIC 118.02 2.81 118.02 2.81 ok
2 WS-X6516-GBIC 142.80 3.40 142.80 3.40 ok
5 WS-X6416-GE-MT 105.00 2.50 105.00 2.50 ok
6 WS-X6148-GE-TX 103.74 2.47 103.74 2.47 ok
7 WS-SUP720-BASE 315.00 7.50 315.00 7.50 ok
8 WS-X6548-GE-TX 142.80 3.40 315.00 7.50 ok
9 WS-X6748-GE-TX 325.50 7.75 325.50 7.75 ok
10 WS-X6548-GE-TX 142.80 3.40 142.80 3.40 ok
12 WS-X6704-10GE 295.26 7.03 295.26 7.03 ok
13 WS-X6748-SFP 254.94 6.07 254.94 6.07 ok
Michael Balasko
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:55 PM
To: Simon Lockhart
Cc: Church, Chuck; Gert Doering; Jay Ford; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] power requirement for sup720 migration
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 09:15:09PM +0000, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> On the 6503, slot 2 reserves enough power for you to plug in a 2nd
> Supervisor, which is why it looks like the 6516 in that slot is using
> more power than the other...
Hmmm. Good point.
(Anyone having -GBIC blades in *other* slots with differing power
requirements?)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025
gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list