[c-nsp] power requirement for sup720 migration

Michael Balasko Michael.Balasko at cityofhenderson.com
Wed Nov 15 19:14:18 EST 2006


Gert, 
I here is a dump of a few of our 6513's Same power allocation for the
same type of blade. 

1    WS-X6K-S2U-MSFC2         145.32  3.46   145.32  3.46  ok
2    WS-X6516-GBIC            142.80  3.40   145.32  3.46  ok
3    WS-X6516-GBIC            142.80  3.40   142.80  3.40  ok
4    WS-X6548-GE-TX           142.80  3.40   142.80  3.40  ok
5    WS-X6548-GE-TX           142.80  3.40   142.80  3.40  ok
6    WS-X6148-GE-TX           103.74  2.47   103.74  2.47  ok
8    WS-X6148-GE-TX           103.74  2.47   103.74  2.47  ok
9    WS-X6148-GE-TX           103.74  2.47   103.74  2.47  ok
10   WS-X6148-GE-TX           103.74  2.47   103.74  2.47  ok
11   WS-X6148-GE-TX           103.74  2.47   103.74  2.47  ok
12   WS-X6516-GBIC            142.80  3.40   142.80  3.40  ok
13   WS-X6416-GBIC            118.02  2.81   118.02  2.81  ok          

1    WS-X6K-S2U-MSFC2         145.32  3.46   145.32  3.46  ok
2    WS-X6516-GBIC            142.80  3.40   145.32  3.46  ok
3    WS-X6408-GBIC             63.00  1.50    63.00  1.50  ok
5    WS-X6548-GE-TX           142.80  3.40   142.80  3.40  ok
6    WS-X6548-GE-TX           142.80  3.40   142.80  3.40  ok
8    WS-X6548-GE-TX           142.80  3.40   142.80  3.40  ok
9    WS-X6148-GE-TX           103.74  2.47   103.74  2.47  ok
10   WS-X6148-GE-TX           103.74  2.47   103.74  2.47  ok
11   WS-X6148-GE-TX           103.74  2.47   103.74  2.47  ok
12   WS-X6416-GBIC            118.02  2.81   118.02  2.81  ok
13   WS-X6416-GBIC            118.02  2.81   118.02  2.81  ok  

2    WS-X6516-GBIC            142.80  3.40   142.80  3.40  ok
5    WS-X6416-GE-MT           105.00  2.50   105.00  2.50  ok
6    WS-X6148-GE-TX           103.74  2.47   103.74  2.47  ok
7    WS-SUP720-BASE           315.00  7.50   315.00  7.50  ok
8    WS-X6548-GE-TX           142.80  3.40   315.00  7.50  ok
9    WS-X6748-GE-TX           325.50  7.75   325.50  7.75  ok
10   WS-X6548-GE-TX           142.80  3.40   142.80  3.40  ok
12   WS-X6704-10GE            295.26  7.03   295.26  7.03  ok
13   WS-X6748-SFP             254.94  6.07   254.94  6.07  ok    

Michael Balasko


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:55 PM
To: Simon Lockhart
Cc: Church, Chuck; Gert Doering; Jay Ford; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] power requirement for sup720 migration

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 09:15:09PM +0000, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> On the 6503, slot 2 reserves enough power for you to plug in a 2nd 
> Supervisor, which is why it looks like the 6516 in that slot is using 
> more power than the other...

Hmmm.  Good point.

(Anyone having -GBIC blades in *other* slots with differing power
requirements?)

gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
 
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025
gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list