[c-nsp] power requirement for sup720 migration
Daniel Suchy
ds at nix.cz
Thu Nov 16 09:32:28 EST 2006
Isn't he affected with bug with incorrect EEPROM programing on some
6748? See document at
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_field_notice09186a00802861e1.shtml
BR
Dan
On 11/16/2006 03:11 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:17:31AM +0100, nick.nauwelaerts at thomson.com wrote:
>> It doesn't even have to be a module based blade:
>> 10 WS-X6748-GE-TX 277.62 6.61 277.62 6.61 on on
>> 11 WS-X6748-GE-TX 325.50 7.75 325.50 7.75 on on
>>
>> 10 is a version 1.2 card, 11 is a version 2.2 card.
>
> Interesting to see the more recent card draw *more* power.
>
> (But this is getting increasingly off-topic :) )
>
> gert
>
--
__________________________________________________________________
NIX.CZ z.s.p.o. email: ds at nix.cz
Daniel Suchy, technical specialist tel: +4202 67198350
Nad Elektrarnou 411, Prague 10 fax: +4202 67198349
106 00 Czech Republic http://www.nix.cz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20061116/1f3edeb8/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list