[c-nsp] power requirement for sup720 migration

[Daniel Suchy]

Isn't he affected with bug with incorrect EEPROM programing on some
6748? See document at
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_field_notice09186a00802861e1.shtml

BR
Dan

On 11/16/2006 03:11 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:17:31AM +0100, nick.nauwelaerts at thomson.com wrote:
>> It doesn't even have to be a module based blade:
>> 10   WS-X6748-GE-TX      277.62  6.61   277.62  6.61  on    on
>> 11   WS-X6748-GE-TX      325.50  7.75   325.50  7.75  on    on
>>
>> 10 is a version 1.2 card, 11 is a version 2.2 card.
> 
> Interesting to see the more recent card draw *more* power.
> 
> (But this is getting increasingly off-topic :) )
> 
> gert
> 

-- 
 __________________________________________________________________
 NIX.CZ z.s.p.o.                                email: ds at nix.cz
 Daniel Suchy, technical specialist             tel: +4202 67198350
 Nad Elektrarnou 411, Prague 10                 fax: +4202 67198349
 106 00 Czech Republic                          http://www.nix.cz

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20061116/1f3edeb8/attachment-0001.bin