[c-nsp] Provider border box

[Konstantin Barinov]

Hi,

Why dont you like eigrp? It seems to be more stable than ospf,
at least 7-8 years ago, when I had to chose between ospf and eigrp.
Also, that time eigrp could do unequal path load balance, which was
one of primary advantages to stick with eigrp. Of course, migration
from eigrp to ospf now means only one night of nightmares, but
who wants that? :)


br
--
Konstantin Barinov
INFONET AS, Tallinn, Estonia

Sunday, November 26, 2006, 12:51:34 AM, you wrote:

JP> On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 12:15:01AM +0200, Konstantin Barinov wrote:
JP> [snip]
>> What about Sup32? It is a sweet piece of hardware, primarily because
>> of large buffers per port. Maybe there are some limitations I'm not
>> aware about?

JP> TCAM doom unless you want to replace it relatively soon.  Unless you 
JP> have a raging need for TDM interfaces, stick with your familiar type
JP> of hardware.   You might want to consider a CTMP upgrade of the sup2
JP> box to a sup720 and better balance your 'primary' and 'backup' 
JP> caapcity.

JP> I'm sorry you're using EIGRP; we all haveour crosses to bear.