[c-nsp] transparent bridging question
Frank Cisco
cisco.frank at gmail.com
Mon Oct 2 23:01:34 EDT 2006
Hi Bruce,
I've implemented it, but it's still not working. When the left router
send the packet to the right side, will the layer 2 frame changed from
PPP to Ethernet by cisco 1601? And how the right router know mac
address of serial router, as If I'm not mistaken serial interface
doesn't have mac address.
Frank
On 10/3/06, Bruce Pinsky <bep at whack.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Frank Cisco wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > We have customer using Serial interface but on our site we only have
> > Ethernet interface and will run bgp. Customer doesn't have any spare
> > ethernet port and we also doesn't have spare serial interface. So we plan
> to
> > put one small cisco box (1601 series) in the middle as the cost is cheaper
> > than serial-to-ethernet converter.
> >
> >
> Customer'sRouter------(serial-intf)------Cisco-1601------(Ethernet-intf)-----Our
> > Router
> >
> >
> > In cisco 1601 will configure :
> >
> > interface ethernet 0
> > bridge-group 1
> >
> > interface serial 1
> > bridge-group 1
> >
> > bridge 1 protocol ieee
> >
> >
> > Will this topology will work ? Anybody has experience with it ?
> >
>
> If this is the only thing the box will do, also include "no ip routing" and
> you should be fine. If you need IP routing elsewhere on that router, then
> you will have to get into funky IRB configuration.
>
> - --
> =========
> bep
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFFIYVlE1XcgMgrtyYRAuToAJ0eHqkPdBiwpmK2qZQ+9fYqRSLg/gCgmxex
> w1wG1sj6xcU/IjpHeimoNF4=
> =1IXe
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list