[c-nsp] BGP redistribution into EIGRP

[Tim DeVries]

Hi,

I'm working with a bit of a hokey setup w/ a private AS, and I need to
redistribute the default into EIGRP from iBGP.  I'm working with - Cisco
Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software
(C2600-IK9O3S3-M), Version 12.3(6), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3).

So far I've configured it as follows:
-------------------------------------
router eigrp 100
 redistribute static
 redistribute bgp 65509 route-map check-def
 network 10.10.9.0 0.0.0.255
 network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.3
 network 10.228.164.0 0.0.0.3
 network 10.228.170.0 0.0.0.31
 network 10.228.171.0 0.0.0.255
 network 10.228.181.0 0.0.0.3
 auto-summary

router bgp 65509
 no synchronization
 bgp log-neighbor-changes 
 bgp redistribute-internal
 neighbor 10.228.164.2 remote-as 65509
 neighbor 10.228.164.2 route-reflector-client
 neighbor 10.228.164.2 next-hop-self
 neighbor 10.228.164.2 distribute-list net_tovic out
 neighbor 207.228.x.y remote-as 65509
 no auto-summary

ip prefix-list def-route seq 5 permit 0.0.0.0/0

route-map check-def permit 10
 match ip address prefix-list def-route
---------------------------------------------------

This setup is straight from a link I found on Cisco.

When I do a show ip eigrp top | inc 0.0.0.0 the route isn't making it
into  the EIGRP process.

However doing a sh ip route 0.0.0.0 shows it thinks it is being
redistributed....

RTR2#sh ip route 0.0.0.0
Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet
  Known via "bgp 65509", distance 200, metric 0, candidate default path
  Tag 38xy, type internal
  Redistributing via eigrp 100  <--------------
  Last update from 199.172.x.y 15:39:07 ago
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  * 199.172.x.y, from 207.228.x.y, 15:39:07 ago
      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
      AS Hops 1

RTR2#sh ip eigrp top 0.0.0.0/0
% IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Route not in topology table
----------------------------------------------------------------

So, is there something else I need to do to make this work, or is this
related to my version?  Anyone else had success with this?

Regards,

Tim