[c-nsp] BGP redistribution into EIGRP

[Shakeel Ahmad]

Can you verify on router-2 your 0.0.0.0 next hop (of RTR1) is accessible ?

On 10/5/06, Tim DeVries <tdevries at icsbermuda.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm working with a bit of a hokey setup w/ a private AS, and I need to
> redistribute the default into EIGRP from iBGP.  I'm working with - Cisco
> Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software
> (C2600-IK9O3S3-M), Version 12.3(6), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3).
>
> So far I've configured it as follows:
> -------------------------------------
> router eigrp 100
> redistribute static
> redistribute bgp 65509 route-map check-def
> network 10.10.9.0 0.0.0.255
> network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.3
> network 10.228.164.0 0.0.0.3
> network 10.228.170.0 0.0.0.31
> network 10.228.171.0 0.0.0.255
> network 10.228.181.0 0.0.0.3
> auto-summary
>
> router bgp 65509
> no synchronization
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> bgp redistribute-internal
> neighbor 10.228.164.2 remote-as 65509
> neighbor 10.228.164.2 route-reflector-client
> neighbor 10.228.164.2 next-hop-self
> neighbor 10.228.164.2 distribute-list net_tovic out
> neighbor 207.228.x.y remote-as 65509
> no auto-summary
>
> ip prefix-list def-route seq 5 permit 0.0.0.0/0
>
> route-map check-def permit 10
> match ip address prefix-list def-route
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> This setup is straight from a link I found on Cisco.
>
> When I do a show ip eigrp top | inc 0.0.0.0 the route isn't making it
> into  the EIGRP process.
>
> However doing a sh ip route 0.0.0.0 shows it thinks it is being
> redistributed....
>
> RTR2#sh ip route 0.0.0.0
> Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet
> Known via "bgp 65509", distance 200, metric 0, candidate default path
> Tag 38xy, type internal
> Redistributing via eigrp 100  <--------------
> Last update from 199.172.x.y 15:39:07 ago
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * 199.172.x.y, from 207.228.x.y, 15:39:07 ago
>      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
>      AS Hops 1
>
> RTR2#sh ip eigrp top 0.0.0.0/0
> % IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Route not in topology table
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> So, is there something else I need to do to make this work, or is this
> related to my version?  Anyone else had success with this?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>