[c-nsp] NAT/PAT/Port Forwarding and VOIP
Joseph Jackson
JJackson at aninetworks.com
Tue Oct 24 19:44:26 EDT 2006
I believe something like this would work for you.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6350/products_configuration_guide_
chapter09186a0080455acd.html#wp1067625
It talks about inspection of h.323 traffic crossing the router.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric D. Meyers
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 2:09 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] NAT/PAT/Port Forwarding and VOIP
>
> With a NAT translation, is it possible to 'trigger' or
> pinhole the opening of ports on a Cisco router? For example,
> if an inside host communicates on a specific port or range of
> ports can the NAT be configured to open an inbound port on
> the outside interface to communicate with that host?
>
>
>
> I've got a couple of Siemens 420 IP phones (using HFA rather
> than SIP, by the choice of our telephone group) sitting
> behind a Cisco 827 ADSL router.
> The phones are able to communicate with the gatekeeper
> initially and receive their configuration, but unable to
> establish a call unless TCP1720 is opened. Static mapping
> work well, but I'd rather have something a bit more dynamic.
> I've tried to accomplish this under PAT (using the 'overload'
> option) and using a NAT pool; no joy on anything I've
> attempted as yet.
>
>
>
> If anyone has assistance to offer it would be quite
> appreciated. There might be some e-beer in it for ya.
>
>
>
> Eric Meyers
> email: emeyers at utk.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list