[c-nsp] Same IP on two interfaces?

[Ibrahim]

If you are using router 1700/2600/2800/3600/3700/3800 you could use Ethernet
Switch  (ESW) Module/card . Configure vlan access mode to connected ports,
and configure SVI / interface vlan which is using single IP address. It's
just like a switch.



Regards
Ibrahim

On 10/31/06, Siva Valliappan <svalliap at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> if it's a single device to single device you could look at some kind of
> interface aggregation technique like etherchannel.  depending on your
> platform / interface, you can choose between Etherchannel, ATM IMA,
> POS bundling, etc.
>
> otherwise -
>
> if you are using a L3 switch.  then you could bring in the traffic on a
> SVI and just use 1 IP address on the SVI.
>
> if you are using multiple WAN p2p links, then you could always unnumber
> your interface to the loopback.
>
> cheers
> .siva
>
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Aaron Daniels - Lists wrote:
>
> > Vincent
> >
> >> To summarize:
> >> * my goal is to redundantly connect the router (to other routers behind
> > the
> >> switch network) while using the least amount of IP addresses
> >
> > You appear to be trying to do this at layer 3, so how about a routing
> > protocol?
> > It will require 1 IP for each device (which I think you will find you
> will
> > need anyway).
> > OSPF will do Equal cost multipath, allowing you load balancing and
> > redundancy?
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>