[c-nsp] 1841 suitable for BGP?

Tony Varriale tvarriale at comcast.net
Fri Sep 1 20:14:29 EDT 2006


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gert Doering" <gert at greenie.muc.de>
To: "Tony Varriale" <tvarriale at comcast.net>
Cc: "Mikael Abrahamsson" <swmike at swm.pp.se>; <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 1841 suitable for BGP?

>So what?  It's the job of the CPU to handle, well, "CPU-based" tasks.

Umm...yes?

>Can you spell "prioritization"?

Can you spell "courtesy"? 

>If you see packet losses on a NPE400 *due to CPU load*, you're either
seriously overloading the box with packet forwarding tasks ("too many
small packets"), or you're not using CEF.

Obviously CEF is being used.  But, thanks.

tv



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list