[c-nsp] 2 full BGP feeds on 3750?...expanded

[Mathias at TelecityRedbus.com]

Hi Gert,

You are right for end to end problems although static can still be used
in which case a monitoring package should be used to help close the gap.

Mathias,
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at greenie.muc.de] 
Sent: 06 September 2006 12:45
To: Mathias Kenfack-Tabakem (LON)
Cc: Mark at u.tv; peter.salanki at bahnhof.net; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2 full BGP feeds on 3750?...expanded

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:10:53PM +0100, Mathias at telecityredbus.com
wrote:
> I'll go a step further with that reasoning. Do we need BGP at all in
> that environment? Unless I am missing something I'll argue no. Static
> route and floating static route will do the trick here.

I'd go for BGP "default route only" to make sure you notice if there are
end-to-end problems, but the ethernet link is still "up" (otherwise
you'll have black holes).

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
 
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025
gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
This e-mail is intended only for the use of the addressees named above and may be confidential. 
If you are not an addressee you must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than the addressees of its existence or contents.