[c-nsp] IOS image for 3640 w/ DS3 module
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Sat Sep 9 03:41:06 EDT 2006
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Kevin Graham wrote:
> What's CPU utilization look like? You're going to have to run very
> basic interface configs and hope for large packets to get a 3640 to
> handle a full DS3.
Well, I actually have to agree with Mark, the original poster. I have
consistantly verified performance differences between different IOSes on
the 3640, though this was with HSSI/Kentrox to go over DS3. It was at
least a factor 2 difference, whereas without features with just a few FTP
sessions the 3640 would go at full CPU on some versions, but not with
others. This was just basic setup with WFQ on the interfaces and basic IP
routing.
The strange thing was that there was a difference between a 12.1 config
booted on 12.0S, and a 12.0S config booted on 12.0S. So basically, if I
booted 12.1 (or 12.2), did a "write", and rebooted into 12.0(28)S, it
worked properly. If I wrote the config on the 12.0 and rebooted, I got
worse performance.
The solution in question is no longer active so I can't log a TAC case on
it, but it was quite strange, but 100% reproducable, I did it 5 times
in a row to really verify the problem.
So basically what I'm saying, is that the 3640 hardware can fill a DS3
using HSSI and certain IOS version, where traffic is mostly a few TCP
sessions (so mostly large packets and ACKs, where the large packets are
going one way and the ACKs are going the other), and there seems to be
some IOS weirdness going on that makes this differ between versions.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list