[c-nsp] performance on virtual interface and physical interface
Rudy Setiawan
rudy at rudal.com
Mon Sep 18 16:18:48 EDT 2006
Heya all,
Got a question about performance.
The device is a 6509 SUP1A-GE/MSFC2/PFC
IOS based software
A Catalyst 5513 switch with Sup3 will act as the switch.
6509 config A:
Interface Gi2/1
No ip address
!
Interface VLAN100
Ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
*VTP resides in this config.
6509 config B:
Interface Gi2/1
No ip address
!
Interface Gi2/1.100
Encapsulation dot1q 100
Ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
*Vtp resides on catalyst 5513
So between config A and config B, which has better performance in both
ingress and egress?
Thank you.
Regards,
Rudy Setiawan
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list