[c-nsp] 3rd party Xenpak for 65xx
Richard A Steenbergen
ras at e-gerbil.net
Fri Sep 22 13:51:30 EDT 2006
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:47:15PM +0200, Blake Willis wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20 2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> > Not true, service unsupported-transceiver enables third party XENPAKs as
> > well. I have more than a few Foundry branded LR XENPAKs which only run
> > with service unsupported and detect as:
> >
> > Te3/1 connected trunk full 10G bad EEPROM
> > Te3/4 connected trunk full 10G bad EEPROM
>
> Hmmm, when I tested a few (Mitsu, Agilent, etc), I couldn't even get
> a CDP neighbor to show up:
>
> Te2/2 disabled 1 full 10G unapproved
> Te2/3 disabled 1 full 10G unapproved
>
> Admittedly this was quite a while ago, and the lab box I was using
> at the time was running either SXB or an early version of SXE (had one of
> each, don't remember which one I was using that day, but probably SXE2 or
> something as I don't recall SXB having 'unsupported transceiver' capability,
> and I remember having some Sumitomo SFPs in the sup at the time that
> worked). Good to know that with newer releases this behaviour has changed.
I think you're confusing "disabled" with "errdisabled". In your example
above, you just need to go "no shut" the port which is admin down by
default. :)
And yes "service unsupported-transceiver" was added in SXE, in code
earlier than this there was no way to turn off the vendor locking for SFP
and XENPAK.
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list