[c-nsp] 877W and IPv6 over WLAN, not possible today?

[Jared Mauch]

On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 05:27:32PM +0300, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2006-09-26 10:22 -0400), Jared Mauch wrote:
>  
> > 	Ihad someone asking me about this the other day and
> > I came up with a cool workaround...
> > 
> > 	if you apply the IP(v6 ip) to one of the interfaces that
> > is part of the bridge, it should work ;)
> 
> Hit me harder with the cluebat. I have dot0.1 and VLAN1 that 
> are part of the bridge-group. I can add IPv6 address to VLAN1,
> my IPv4 addresses are in BVI1.
> Adding IPv6 to BVI1 does not work, as IRB does not support routing
> or bridging IPv6. Adding IPv6 VLAN1 made no sense to me, but
> I tried it anyway, no luck. dot0.1 and dot0 do not accept
> IPv6 address at 12.4(9)T

	Now, not 100% similar, but a workaround for people who need
to do odd bvi stuff.  Putting the ipv6 on an interface in the
bridge group solved the problem for this coworker.  It may not
work in your situation, but worth a shot.  Having some
el-cheapo consumer electronics device instead of an "advaced router"
type of device sometimes is a better solution for your wireless
needs.  

ipv6 unicast-routing
!
bridge irb
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 description out to lame provider
 no ip address
 no ip redirects
 no ip proxy-arp
 load-interval 30
 speed 100
 full-duplex
 ipv6 enable
 bridge-group 1
!
interface FastEthernet1/0
 description internal LAN
 no ip address
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 ipv6 address 3ffe:3ffe:3ffe:1::1/64
 ipv6 enable
 bridge-group 1
!
interface BVI1
 description bundle fa-0-0 / fa-1-0
 ip address 192.168.10.226 255.255.255.0
 no ip redirects
 ip ospf cost 1
 ipv6 enable
!
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 BVI1
!
bridge 1 protocol ieee
bridge 1 route ip



-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.