[c-nsp] Layer 3 Core
Bruce Pinsky
bep at whack.org
Thu Apr 5 14:44:08 EDT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Backholm wrote:
> Currently where I work we run a complete Layer 3 network core. This
> decision was made in order to keep Spanning Tree Protocol, ACls, QoS,
> and Policing out of the core and at the distribution layer. This has
> worked well for us, but we have a need for a few of our server VLANs to
> be in opposite geographic ends of campus for redundancy. These servers
> run as clusters and require Layer 2 connectivity between them, so in
> other words we need Layer 2 connectivity across our Layer 3 core.
>
>
> Here is the question.
>
> Would it be better to solve this problem with MPLS or just trunk the
> handful of server VLANs across our core?
>
>
> Your thoughts and/or suggestions are appreciated.
>
L2TPv3 based pseudowires.
- --
=========
bep
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGFUN4E1XcgMgrtyYRAn3JAJ9GQKFie/smrVRrDv0c83DtD+SlnQCfaWBB
MMbEkg6ShBzAK+beJLdewcY=
=Qc2Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list