[c-nsp] TE over Etherchannel

[Phil Bedard]

I'd also like to see any restrictions that are placed on doing FRR on  
Etherchannels, since I was going to be testing this functionality
in the near future...Is there any roadmap for this feature for SRB?

Phil


On Aug 21, 2007, at 8:58 AM, <alaerte.vidali at nsn.com>  
<alaerte.vidali at nsn.com> wrote:

> Thanks,
>
> Do you know if the restriction is only for dynamic path?
>
> I have seem and tested implementations using static path where the
> backup tunnel (used by FRR) takes layer 3 etherchannel, and it worked
> fine during the failure simulation.
>
> Br,
> Alaerte
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Rodney Dunn [mailto:rodunn at cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 8:07 PM
> To: Vidali Alaerte (NSN - BR/Rio de Janeiro)
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] TE over Etherchannel
>
> That's right. I've seen that from the BU's that it's not currently
> supported. I hear it's on the roadmap to be "officially" supported.
>
> Rodney
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 07:04:09AM -0500, alaerte.vidali at nsn.com  
> wrote:
>>  Have you heard such affirmation before?
>>
>> "TE FRR is not supported over Etherchannel"
>>
>> Under SX releases, the only feature that it says it is not supported
>> under etherchannel is DS-TE.
>> I have used backup tunnel taking etherchannel and it worked for  
>> years.
>
>>
>> Now this statement means that between two P routers layer 3
>> etherchannel cannot be used.
>>
>> Tks,
>> Alaerte
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Phil Bedard
philxor at gmail.com