[c-nsp] 10G LFS function

Hiromasa Sekiguchi hiromasa.sekiguchi at ctc-g.co.jp
Wed Dec 12 06:14:27 EST 2007


I understand LFS/RF is much faster.

I'd like to only know whether we can disable it or not.

Regards,
Hiromasa


Marian Ďurkovič wrote [2007/12/12 19:54(JST)]:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:21:22PM +0900, Hiromasa Sekiguchi wrote:
>> Thank you for your advice.
>>
>> If we don't need LFS function (e.g. use BFD), can we disable it?
> 
> Why would you like to do this? LFS / Remote fault detection is much faster
> and triggers reconvergence immediately - so it's good to have it enabled
> even though you use BFD as well.
> 
>    With kind regards,
> 
> 	M.



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list