[c-nsp] 10G LFS function
Hiromasa Sekiguchi
hiromasa.sekiguchi at ctc-g.co.jp
Wed Dec 12 06:14:27 EST 2007
I understand LFS/RF is much faster.
I'd like to only know whether we can disable it or not.
Regards,
Hiromasa
Marian Ďurkovič wrote [2007/12/12 19:54(JST)]:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:21:22PM +0900, Hiromasa Sekiguchi wrote:
>> Thank you for your advice.
>>
>> If we don't need LFS function (e.g. use BFD), can we disable it?
>
> Why would you like to do this? LFS / Remote fault detection is much faster
> and triggers reconvergence immediately - so it's good to have it enabled
> even though you use BFD as well.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> M.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list