[c-nsp] Cosmetic bug or unsupported NPE?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:18:54AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:50:23AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > > I really have to object to this FUD,
> > >
> > > I run 2 NPE300's in 7206VXR's, 2 uplinks and ibgp and getting full table
> > >
> > > Here's output on ios 12.2.32:
> >
> > That's not 12.2*S* - 12.2 main has less memory impact, because it has the
> > old CEF code (and no MPLS, no IPv6, and whatever else people might want).
> 
> "no MPLS, no IPv6, and whatever else people might want"
> 
> Your making an awfully big assumption there that everyone wants IPv6 and
> MPLS.  What is the argument your trying to make anyway?  

I'm pointing out that your argument "Ytti is talking FUD" is zilch,
if you're comparing 12.2 main line to 12.2S.  Which is a very much 
different IOS train, with different features, and a very much different
memory footprint.

> That since
> "everyone wants MPLS that Cisco is right to chuck out the NPE300"

Never said that, and never agreed with Cisco's decision to obsolete a
product right in the middle of an IOS train.  Please re-read my mail.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de