[c-nsp] route-map 'continue' broken in 6500 12.2(18)SXF6?

Collins, Richard (SNL US) rich.collins at siemens.com
Thu Feb 8 13:34:06 EST 2007


I took another look at my setup with the 7613, Sup720 and 12.2(18)SXF6

It does indeed seem to work on the SXF6 but only for an input route-map
such as Gert's example.

This is not working for an output route-map (should it or does it for
SXF7?)


route-map test-continue permit 10
 match community Nils
 continue 30
 set community 5539:1000 additive
!
route-map test-continue deny 20
!
route-map test-continue permit 30
 set community 5539:3000 additive
!
SUP720#sh ip community-list
Named Community expanded list Nils
    permit 0:444

Result:

Cisco#sh ip bgp 172.36.1.0
BGP routing table entry for 172.36.1.0/24, version 45
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Flag: 0x880
  Advertised to update-groups:
     1
  254 400
    10.10.60.1 from 10.10.60.1 (1.1.1.1)
      Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best
      Community: 0:444 5539:1000


Rgds,
Richard



>Thanks Gert for testing it out!  I'll give this a try soon, I've a box
with
>SXF7 going online shortly on the network.
>
>Regards,
>james
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at greenie.muc.de]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 9:51 AM
>> To: James Jun
>> Cc: 'Gert Doering'; 'Collins, Richard (SNL US)';
cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] route-map 'continue' broken in 6500
12.2(18)SXF6?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in December, we had this thread about "incoming route-map with
continue
>> not working in <some> SXF* releases".
>>
>> Today, I finally managed to build a test setup (because there's a
router
>> needing an upgrade to SXF7 "real soon now"), and I can confirm that
>> continue (for *incoming* routes) *does* work.
>>
>> Here's the setup:
>>
>>  - 7603, Sup720, 12.2(18)SXF7
>>
>>  - incoming route-map:
>>
>>     route-map test-continue permit 10
>>      continue 30
>>      set community 5539:10000 additive
>>     !
>>     route-map test-continue deny 20
>>     !
>>     route-map test-continue permit 30
>>      set community 5539:30000 additive
>>
>>
>>  - eBGP peer that announces 10.10.0.0/16, with "soft in"
>>
>>  - that's what I see:
>>
>>     Cisco#sh ip b 10.10.0.0
>>     BGP routing table entry for 10.10.0.0/16, version 5556445
>>     Paths: (2 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
>>     Flag: 0x820
>>       Advertised to update-groups:
>>       2          6
>>       65500
>>      194.97.148.100 (metric 156416) from 194.97.148.100
(194.97.148.100)
>>        Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best
>>        Community: 5539:10000 5539:30000
>>       65500, (received-only)
>>      194.97.148.100 (metric 156416) from 194.97.148.100
(194.97.148.100)
>>        Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external
>>
>>
>> -> so from my PoV "incoming route-maps with continue statements are
>> working in SXF7 as documented", and I don't see any issue.
>>
>> gert
>>
>> --
>> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>>
>> //www.muc.de/~gert/
>> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
>> gert at greenie.muc.de
>> fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-
>> muenchen.de
>
>



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list