[c-nsp] VRF-Lite Question
Phil Mayers
p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Thu Feb 15 09:47:39 EST 2007
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:17:44AM -0400, Ray Burkholder wrote:
>>
>> If you can afford 6500s and sup32s in each building then all
>> fine and well, but you've got more money than I've got.
>
>Nope, not I, although I do day-dream of the day.
Neither me!
>
>
>>
>> No. The 3550/3750s support 802.1q tags and that's it.
>>
>> To repeat myself: lots of per-VRF L3 point-to-point SVIs and
>> vlan tagging, lots of routing adjacencies. That's the only
>> way you'll get this done on 3550/3750s. They're limited platforms.
>>
>> We have a lot as outlying site routers, and I've done
>> extensive investigation of how we could least-effort link
>> them into our shiny 6500 network. The answer is, a lot of typing.
>>
>
>One more wrinkle. Some of these interbuilding links are through a
>provider's private vlan system. No Q. No Q in Q. What is the
>recommendation for that?
Ah. Then you've got big problems.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list