[c-nsp] sup720 protection on the 6500/7600

[Sukumar Subburayan]

Charles et al,

We are investigating (as we speak), if this limitation is fixable in 
PFC3C. Will keep you all posted.

sukumar




On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Phil Mayers wrote:

>> However, the bugID *does* suggest a way to avoid triggering this
>> condition: "The symptom can be alleviated by avoiding generating
>> packets to the RP (ie. this router)."
>
> Oh, that's just marvellous.
>
> I could almost live with this if it were just the receive limiter, which
> is far less useful than CoPP. But there's no way to emulate the glean
> limiter with CoPP, and if (as we are) you happen to be routing a lot of
> subnets on the box, you might want to limit the possible damage of an
> address-space sweep.
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
>
> "Cisco - Market Leader in giving you disappointing news!"
>
> :o(
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>