[c-nsp] sup720 protection on the 6500/7600

Sukumar Subburayan sukumars at cisco.com
Mon Feb 19 21:14:19 EST 2007


Charles et al,

We are investigating (as we speak), if this limitation is fixable in 
PFC3C. Will keep you all posted.

sukumar




On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Phil Mayers wrote:

>> However, the bugID *does* suggest a way to avoid triggering this
>> condition: "The symptom can be alleviated by avoiding generating
>> packets to the RP (ie. this router)."
>
> Oh, that's just marvellous.
>
> I could almost live with this if it were just the receive limiter, which
> is far less useful than CoPP. But there's no way to emulate the glean
> limiter with CoPP, and if (as we are) you happen to be routing a lot of
> subnets on the box, you might want to limit the possible damage of an
> address-space sweep.
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
>
> "Cisco - Market Leader in giving you disappointing news!"
>
> :o(
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list