[c-nsp] 12.2SR PB on CCO for 65xx and 76xx split
Jared Mauch
jared at puck.nether.net
Wed Feb 21 12:58:37 EST 2007
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:50:40PM -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Rodney Dunn wrote:
>
> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/prod_bulletin0900aecd805df25d.html
>
> Lame. There seems to be an implied admission that 12.2SX and 12.2SR are
> both totally capable of ignoring the label on the chassis, but 12.2SR will
> cease doing that except for special cases (I suppose where a customer
> convinces cisco that they will in fact buy new chassis, but not all at
> once).
>
> Is it at least safe to assume that if we're satisfied with the current L3
> feature-set in 12.2SXn (i.e. routing protocols, MPLS, netflow, etc.) that
> cisco's not going to pull the rug out from under us and say "oh, you
> wanted a router, go buy a 7600 chassis)?
the SX* software has no current plans to implement any of these
silly checks. If you're happy with SX*, stick with it. I'd avoid
buying a 7600 unless there's a compelling technical reason. it's surely
not a service provider platform as it has no software modularity.
- jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list