[c-nsp] sup720 protection on the 6500/7600

[Tim Durack]

Great. When is the SUP720-3C going to be available?

Tim:>

On 2/26/07, Sukumar Subburayan <sukumars at cisco.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Here is the update. Good news is that we will have the fix for this with
> PFC3C based systems.
>
> sukumar
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Sukumar Subburayan wrote:
>
> > Charles et al,
> >
> > We are investigating (as we speak), if this limitation is fixable in
> > PFC3C. Will keep you all posted.
> >
> > sukumar
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Phil Mayers wrote:
> >
> >>> However, the bugID *does* suggest a way to avoid triggering this
> >>> condition: "The symptom can be alleviated by avoiding generating
> >>> packets to the RP (ie. this router)."
> >>
> >> Oh, that's just marvellous.
> >>
> >> I could almost live with this if it were just the receive limiter, which
> >> is far less useful than CoPP. But there's no way to emulate the glean
> >> limiter with CoPP, and if (as we are) you happen to be routing a lot of
> >> subnets on the box, you might want to limit the possible damage of an
> >> address-space sweep.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the pointer.
> >>
> >> "Cisco - Market Leader in giving you disappointing news!"
> >>
> >> :o(
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>