[c-nsp] sup720 protection on the 6500/7600

[Sukumar Subburayan]

Folks,

Here is the update. Good news is that we will have the fix for this with 
PFC3C based systems.

sukumar





On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Sukumar Subburayan wrote:

> Charles et al,
>
> We are investigating (as we speak), if this limitation is fixable in
> PFC3C. Will keep you all posted.
>
> sukumar
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Phil Mayers wrote:
>
>>> However, the bugID *does* suggest a way to avoid triggering this
>>> condition: "The symptom can be alleviated by avoiding generating
>>> packets to the RP (ie. this router)."
>>
>> Oh, that's just marvellous.
>>
>> I could almost live with this if it were just the receive limiter, which
>> is far less useful than CoPP. But there's no way to emulate the glean
>> limiter with CoPP, and if (as we are) you happen to be routing a lot of
>> subnets on the box, you might want to limit the possible damage of an
>> address-space sweep.
>>
>> Thanks for the pointer.
>>
>> "Cisco - Market Leader in giving you disappointing news!"
>>
>> :o(
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>