[c-nsp] ATM soft-vc path selection

Michel Renfer michel.renfer at finecom.ch
Sun Jan 14 07:00:32 EST 2007


Did you try to optimize the soft-vc routing with the following 
commands?

switch(config)#atm route-optimization ?
  percentage-threshold  configure route optimization percentage
threshold

Or manually:

switch#atm route-optimization soft-connection interface atm x/x/x

cheers,
michel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Clayton Zekelman
> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 4:01 AM
> To: Cisco NSP
> Subject: [c-nsp] ATM soft-vc path selection
> 
> 
> 
> I have a network of LS1010 switches, and recently added a second DS3
> link between 2 nodes.
> 
> I'm using PNNI between the 2 switches, and am trying to get the soft
> vc's to utilize both DS3's.
> 
> SwitchA# show atm pnni neigh
> 
> Neighbors For Node (Index 1, Level 56)
> 
>   Neighbor Name: SwitchB, Node number: 12
>   Neighbor Node Id: 56:160:47.009181000000003085A72F01.003085A72F01.00
>   Neighboring Peer State: Full
>   Link Selection For CBR    : minimize blocking of future calls
>   Link Selection For VBR-RT : minimize blocking of future calls
>   Link Selection For VBR-NRT: minimize blocking of future calls
>   Link Selection For ABR    : balance load
>   Link Selection For UBR    : balance load
>    Port                      Remote Port Id            Hello state
>    ATM0/0/3                  ATM0/0/0                  2way_in
>    ATM0/0/0                  ATM0/0/3                  2way_in  (Flood
> Port)
> 
> 
> SwitchB# show atm pnni neigh
> 
> Neighbors For Node (Index 1, Level 56)
> 
>   Neighbor Name: SwitchA, Node number: 10
>   Neighbor Node Id: 56:160:47.00918100000000308563C401.00308563C401.00
>   Neighboring Peer State: Full
>   Link Selection For CBR    : minimize blocking of future calls
>   Link Selection For VBR-RT : minimize blocking of future calls
>   Link Selection For VBR-NRT: minimize blocking of future calls
>   Link Selection For ABR    : balance load
>   Link Selection For UBR    : balance load
>    Port                      Remote Port Id            Hello state
>    ATM0/0/0                  ATM0/0/3                  2way_in
>    ATM0/0/3                  ATM0/0/0                  2way_in  (Flood
> Port)
> 
> The 2 switches see eachother through both links, but for some reason
> SVC calls initiated from SwitchA only go out through ATM0/0/0 to
> SwitchB.
> 
> SwitchB connects further down the line to another switch (SwitchC),
> then terminates on a port facing a router.
> 
> 
> I place the calls from SwitchA with:
> 
> interface ATM0/0/2
> atm soft-vc 1 32 dest-address
> 47.0091.8100.0000.00d0.ba70.5401.4000.0c82.1000.00 2 32 rx-cttr 1 tx-
> cttr 1
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list