[c-nsp] 2821 for BGP?
nealr
neal at lists.rauhauser.net
Tue Jan 16 18:44:52 EST 2007
The processor and ram requirements have been addressed by others -
should be fine on a 28xx.
I would be worried about HSRP being in this mix - if you have
traffic exiting via R1 and the return path is R2 you may see ICMP and
UDP function but TCP fail due to the asymmetry - FreeBSD will pitch a
fit if it sees traffic returning from a different MAC/IP than it used
for a gateway and Windows boxes just silently fail. Yes, ICMP redirect
yadda yadda yadda ... but if there is any trouble the person working the
host side is very likely to not be able to sort this stuff out on their
own. I treat configurations like this as a serious design error and do
whatever is required to correct the problem ...
If you've got some deal with the upstream provider for two links and
just default routes over BGP then this could be made to work, but it has
to be a strict ordering of resources -R1 and link1 are primary unless
they die, in which case T2/link2 becomes responsible.
miguel wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> I know that the 38xx is the default router recommended for BGP
> applications. However, I was wondering if any of you have been working
> with the 2821 (or 2811) with BGP. I'm worry about CPU usage.
> So this is the general config.
>
> link1 link2
> | |
> | |
> R1 ----(HSRP)-----------R2
> | |
> -------------LAN---------
>
>
> Each router will have a BGP default route to link 1, and an alternative
> route to link 2.
> The maximum throughput will be 5-6Mbps
>
> Now, has anybody work with something like this (or similar) with this
> type of routers?
>
> PS: I'm not worry about memory, cos' I can upgrade it to 512.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list